March 11, 2013 7:51 am
The world of education is changing again and like many changes it is bringing us almost full circle. If you are a teacher of about fifty years or older you may just about be able to remember a time before the National Curriculum and when levels weren’t part of your life (even if like me you are struggling to remember what you had for lunch or where your car keys are). This is not quite taking us back full circle to pre-1988 as the sharp edge of accountability means you aren’t likely to tell a new Science teacher that you “can teach them (less able Year 10 group) anything you like as long as you keep them in the classroom.” The latter part of this instruction proved more difficult than I at first thought.
Much has changed in education with respect to the level of informed professional practice of teachers and the degree of accountability we all experience. The excellent SSAT Redesigning School Symposia are up and running in both Manchester and London. With Dylan Wiliam leading on the development of new curricula and assessment – the “what” we have to do – and Andy Hargreaves on Professional Capacity – the “how” to do it – we can move with both excitement and no small degree of trepidation into the next phase of education in this country. It’s time for the profession to take the lead, working with government and other interested parties, to deliver an education fit for the 21st Century and fit for our students.
Dylan’s classic one liner was “don’t implement things you don’t believe in.” I wonder what your school’s response was to the E-Bacc a number of years ago.
We need to get our curriculum compass out and make sure we know which way we are heading particularly if, after years of being told what to do, we’ve lost sight of why we are doing certain things within the curriculum. At the symposium we were challenged to think about seven curriculum principles and which where the most important three. I failed miserably to identify just three but managed to realise it is the tension between the different principles that was going to be key in breathing life into the curriculum at St. Mary’s.
Dylan’s principles for a good curriculum were: balanced, rigorous, coherent, vertically integrated, appropriate, focused and relevant (you need to take care with these terms as they had a technical meaning that doesn’t necessarily relate directly to everyday use and meaning).
In developing our new curriculum what would teachers need to know if they were going to be effective? Here’s my starter for teachers but you will need to add your own thoughts as well:
What does research say about the most effective teachers and the pedagogy they use? Hattie goes for: teacher clarity (learning intentions & success criteria), feedback (but make sure the learner has to respond to it by improving his/her work), relationships and peer discussions. If you have fifteen minutes this is a great summary of Hattie’s work presented by himself on what to do and what not to do.
I had the chance to listen to Dylan a couple of year’s ago at a SSAT Think tank and immediately went back to school to redraft the College’s Curriculum Policy. After discussions with staff it was written in the style of a handbook and may give you some ideas about what to do and what to avoid. We are currently challenging ourselves to increase the pace in Key Stage 3 by building programmes of study based on learning intentions written in SOLO Taxonomy style. We want to make seven sub-levels progress in Key Stage 3 for all students and more with the most and least able.
Now that brings me to the afternoon’s work which nearly made my head explode. What are we going to do if, as it seems likely, levels disappear? If you are a teacher under fifty you won’t know life without levels. Now don’t get me wrong I realise that levels were pretty much made up by subject groups sat in rooms, have been revised, revised again, had sub-levels introduced and by now probably don’t really link to how subject knowledge and concepts are vertically organised and integrated. I know this but there is something very comfortable about the familiar. I sense the comfort blanket is about to be taken away and we are going to grow up rapidly as a profession – we are more than capable of meeting this challenge with a little more wisdom from Dylan and some assessment principles. We focussed on summative assessment. The principles to guide in building a reliable system are:
The introduction of data and its use in schools over the last decade has taught us much: make sure you know a student’s starting point (teach them from this point), set challenging and explicit goals linked to specific knowledge, understanding and skills that s/he needs to attain and check how they are going during lessons, at the end of topics and periodically through the key stage. The information generated from assessments can be used to monitor progress and intervene when necessary. This is great learning for us as professionals.
As we hopefully take the lead in matters of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment there is a need to make sure we build the professional capacity within our school, localities and nationally. That was day two of the Redesigning Schools symposia with Andy Hargreaves, PC = f [HC, SC, DC], the “how” we can do it.
This is my second ever blog, the first attempt to write one I have managed to lose in the ether. If you find it please send it back to me. I’ll gather my thoughts on the building of professional capital, courtesy of Andy Hargreaves and blog again.
Thanks to Dylan Wiliam for a fantastic day and to Sue Williamson who is leading the SSAT onto fertile and crucially important ground. Interested in Redesigning Schools? Get involved.
Posted by LeadingLearner
Categories: Redesigning Schools
Tags: Assessment, Curriculum, Education, Redesigning Schools, SSAT
Mobile Site | Full Site
Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.
I very much enjoyed reading your second ever blog and have found this plus the Hattiesburg video clip posted recently thought provoking….I look forward to future instalments.
By Nkh1970 on March 11, 2013 at 9:52 pm
Sorry Hattie blog….I don’t think I will ever get to grips with predictive text on Apple devices!
By Nkh1970 on March 11, 2013 at 9:53 pm
[…] We are going to need to get much better at assessment including the summative element by understanding key principles and developing some highly effective practice. This blog post is built on the symposium led by Dylan Wiliam that I have previously written about titled, “Redesigning the School’s Curriculum: Find your Compass.” […]
By Redesigning Classrooms: Is Your Summative Assessment Trustworthy? | headstmary's Blog on April 12, 2013 at 2:44 pm
[…] We are going to need to get much better at assessment including the summative element by understanding key principles and developing some highly effective practice. This blog post is built on the symposium led by Dylan Wiliam that I have previously written about titled, “Redesigning the School’s Curriculum: Find your Compass.” […]
By Redesigning Classrooms: Is Your Summative Assessment Trustworthy? | Leading Learner on July 22, 2013 at 9:58 am
[…] I’m now blogging from a new site http://www.leadinglearner.me and you can find the post “Redesigning the School’s Curriculum: Find Your Compass” here. […]
By Redesigning the School’s Curriculum: Find Your Compass | Leading Learner on July 22, 2013 at 10:11 am