//
you're reading...
Leadership

RandD Community: Let’s Start to Really Peer Assess

A R&D Community could be set up by any member of staff.Last year we established Research & Development Communities at St. Mary’s Catholic College.  The members of the communities were self-selecting and the aim was to develop and embed best or emerging good practice within the College.  Each R&D Community was set up to take forward an idea, innovation or approach by a group of staff that would lead to improved standards of attainment, levels of achievement, student well-being or student personal development.

Photo Credit: The Italian Voice via Compfight cc

Photo Credit: The Italian Voice via Compfight cc

  • Each R&D Community had a named leader who would be responsible for the community, its outcomes and for leading a group of staff of between 3-8 people. 
  • Funding of £100 per person in the R&D Community was made available to fund the community’s work.
  • The leader of the R&D Community must commit to knowledge capture and transfer at the college, local and regional level as required.  The leader has a small reduction in teaching commitment to give her/him additional time

This mid-year report is from Natasha Preston who is leading a R&D Community looking at the Use of Peer & Self Assessment in English.  Natasha is in her second year of teaching.

I love my job. I love my subject. I love planning. I love the students I teach, and yes, I even mean the challenging ones who make you question your sanity! However, there was one thing that truly made me question my decision to be an English teacher.

When I started at St. Mary’s last year, I was brimming with enthusiasm and determination to always be the best I could be for every student I taught. However, as an NQT, I’d yet to meet the demon who was to become my nemesis: marking!  As an excitable NQT, I’d spend hours poring over students’ work with my green pen (never red of course!), stamping excellent work and leaving detailed feedback for students. As our school policy dictates that students must act upon the feedback and improve their work, in my first term I rarely felt that the marking was a waste of time and I could see the value of giving detailed feedback. After seeing the results of an improved piece of work, I would brim with pride that my comments had helped to create that.

Photo Credit: kennysarmy via Compfight cc

Photo Credit: kennysarmy via Compfight cc

Then the reality hit.

My massive workload increased and marking became a laborious task that resulted in very little pleasure. It wasn’t the marking itself, but the vast amounts that needed to be done and the time constraints that meant I was often working 12 hour days. It was impacting on my planning time and the sleepless nights would often leave my feeling grouchy. Being proactive, I spoke to colleagues and asked for advice, only to find that they were also struggling with our new policy, and I tried numerous strategies I had read about online. During a departmental CPD session, I broached the idea of using more peer assessment and most colleagues agreed that this would be ideal; unfortunately, the general consensus seemed to be that the students, “Were rubbish at it.” Teachers also noted that our students “hated” peer assessment and the idea was often met with a huge groan!

When the idea of leading an R&D community was broached, I was determined to find out if peer assessment could be the following things: effective, completed to the standard of a teacher and a way of improving students’ work. For a starting point, and to help focus my own aims, I completed the #5MinResearchPlan and set to work.

Thanks to Natasha for this Example - Peer Assessment

Thanks to Natasha for this Example – Peer Assessment

After recruiting other members of the department who had been feeling the strain of marking, and I assure you that I didn’t struggle in gaining volunteers, we started by identifying a cohort of students of which we could work with. Three classes were identified to be given ‘intensive’ peer assessment training and they were to be compared to the opposite side of the year of an equal ability level. The process involved one group simply being told to peer assess against the success criteria, whilst the second group were given training. Across the three cohorts, all ability levels were reflected, with varying target grades from 3c to 8cs.  In addition to this a control group was also identified who were to have have their formative assessments marked, as usual, by a teacher.

What exactly was the ‘intensive’ training?

A variety of techniques were trialled and work in this area is on-going. Below is a list of just some of the things that were tried:

  • Active work on exploring the success criteria and developing students’ ability to recognise the importance of engaging with success criteria.   
  • In response to students’ questionnaire answers, the important factors were identified and students produced videos on the importance of peer assessment. This builds on the work of my colleague, Helen, who is an advocate of flipped learning.  Students really relished this task!
  • Teacher modelling of poor, good and excellent examples of peer assessment comments.
  • Providing students with specific step-by-step sheets detailing the process they needed to follow. This included simple instructions like 1) read through WITHOUT a pen in your hand 2) Read again and place a tick next to any parts you enjoyed. The enthusiasm for ticking was much higher than anticipated! 
  • Having a ‘special’ set of teacher pens that students could only use when peer assessment was taking place.  Again, it’s often the simple things when it comes to engaging students in a fairly mundane task!

So what have I experienced so far?

Data Results

Numerical data was gathered by assigning students an APP level prior to the peer assessment and after they had completed a learner response. Three students (highest, mid-range and lowest ability) were selected from each group and the results were interesting. I have included to results of one student from each group below starting with a Year 7 Middle Ability Group:

Indicative Results of Self & Peer Assessment

Indicative Results of Self & Peer Assessment

The data I have selected is representative of the findings across the board. Nevertheless, I have seen other things happen that have pleased me just as much:

  • Students finally engaging with success criteria, instead of just sticking it in their books and ignoring it.
  • Students who want to peer assess as they are realising that it helps them improve their own work, as well as their peers’ work.
  • High quality feedback completed by students that is often more detailed and specific than what teachers would have been able to provide due to time constraints.
  • It made teachers reflect on the success criteria they had been creating. Did it specify what it meant to be excellent? Had every point on it been taught explicitly?
  • A buzz amongst staff who are now feeling confident enough to use peer assessment and to help ease the burden of their ever-increasing workloads.
  • More time for planning engaging and rigorous lessons.
  • Genuine excitement about trialling a new strategy that will benefit us all.

What happens next?

The development of this scheme is far from over and appropriate strategies for KS2, KS4 and KS5 need to be explored. Likewise, further development needs to take place on ensuring that students can peer assess reading with the same success of reading.

We hope to take part in a transition project with our local feeder primary schools and continue trying out other strategies. In addition to this, we would like to work with other departments on improving their approaches to peer assessment. In my humble opinion, I believe that research should be something that benefits the following: you individually your school, your department or your students. In an ideal world, it will meet all four of these criteria. As it stands, we have focused on three and hope to reach four by the end of the year.

Final Thoughts

I’m sure that some of you who are reading this may be scratching your heads and wondering what all of the fuss is about. Have you already been doing this for years? Fantastic! The point I need to make is that we hadn’t!

This may not feel like a ground-breaking idea, but it has broken the back of a mountain of marking that felt, at times, so debilitating to what we all strived to do: to be the best teachers we could hope to be.

Advertisements

Discussion

7 thoughts on “RandD Community: Let’s Start to Really Peer Assess

  1. Reblogged this on saleswatchdog.

    Posted by saleswatchdog | March 12, 2014, 11:42 am
  2. Reblogged this on stpaulslearning and commented:
    Worth reading on peer assessment.

    Posted by robcarter2012 | March 12, 2014, 4:31 pm
  3. Really interesting research topic and CPD opportunity again at St Mary’s-thanks as always for sharing-some back from us on a similar theme showing examples from different subjects-big on peer verification-hope useful http://www.meolscophighschool.co.uk/dep-blog/?p=180

    Posted by david jones | March 13, 2014, 9:31 pm
  4. An interesting reflection Stephen. I think the key feature of peer assessment needs to be getting student buy-in.The strategies you wrote about: taking time to ensure students really understand the success criteria; teacher modelling; simple, clear instructions and most importantly (!) special pens do help in my experience. Based on my own observations, I’d be interested to know about the accuracy of the feedback: Have there been instances when the peer feedback was incorrect or inappropriate and if so, how has this been tackled? Thanks, Mel.

    Posted by teachertweaks | March 15, 2014, 1:35 pm
  5. Thanks Stephen – I think it would be interesting to hear about as students do sometimes just get it wrong! However, I think there is great value in peer assessment aside from the feedback itself: students have an audience to put in the effort for; they have regular opportunities to see examples of work from other people and then a chance to use that to reflect on their own work.

    Posted by teachertweaks | March 17, 2014, 6:56 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

New Book: Liminal Leadership

If you're interested in finding out more about how Mangahigh can support your Maths Curriculum please click me

The Teacher Development Trust a national charity supporting effective professional development (please click to find out more)

Blog Stats

  • 811,273 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 20,236 other followers

Follow @LeadingLearner on WordPress.com

COPYRIGHT LICENCE

#5MinMarkingPlan

It won't get your marking done in five minutes but will help your structure your marking so you and the students get the most out of it.

#5MinBehaviourPlan

Getting the behaviour of students right, in the class room, is the challenge for every teacher. This simple planner will take you through the main stages required to help you achieve a purposeful learning envionment

#Outstandingin10Plus10

Ideas and the thinking behind a professional development to help improve the quality of teaching and learning. Keep the learning tight, the lesson plan loose and focus on the learners

Planning to Get Behaviour Right: Research Plus Experience

The thinking behind the #5MinBehaviourPlan and our whole school approach to managing behaviour.

Education for Wisdom

Why the four knowledge dimensions (covering knowledge and skills) and a moral compass are at the heart of an outstanding education.

When Feedback Met Bloom

A look at the power of Feedback to students using Bloom's four knowledge dimensions

%d bloggers like this: