Teachers and parents are becoming increasingly concerned that exam pressures are forcing schools to offer a limited, bare-bones education as they start prepping pupils at younger and younger ages, according to two surveys commissioned by GL Assessment.
In some cases, this means that schools are starting to teach a GCSE syllabus as soon as pupils arrive in Year 7 rather than the recommended Year 10. Two-thirds of teachers (65%) say parents ought to be worried about students being moved on to a so-called ‘GCSE flight path’ too early, with almost as many parents (61%) agreeing. Teachers believe the problem is widespread. Nine in ten of them (90%) think too many schools are pressuring teachers to concentrate on an exam-driven syllabus to the exclusion of the wider curriculum.
This is despite the fact that similar proportions believe that teaching a more rounded curriculum from a young age would better prepare children for later academic success (87%) and for life after school (91%). Parents echo those beliefs, with 76% and 78% respectively agreeing with those propositions.
Commenting on the findings, Geoff Barton, General Secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said:
Stephen Tierney, CEO of Blessed Edward Bamber Multi-Academy Trust and Chair of Headteachers’ Roundtable, pointed out that the issue wasn’t confined to secondary schools:
“The narrowing of the curriculum can be a bigger problem in primary schools, where it can become very focused on KS2 SATs – reading, writing and maths. Moreover, the issue isn’t SATs or GCSEs per se; the greatest issue is what happens as a consequence of the exams with respect to Ofsted and a lesser extent the performance tables. In England the accountability system wags everything else.
Teachers strongly believe there are other costs associated with an over-emphasis on exams. Seven in ten (71%) are concerned that teaching a more restricted curriculum has a negative impact on classroom behaviour, almost eight in ten (78%) think it doesn’t address children who develop at a later stage than their peers, with similar proportions saying it is bad for pupils who have minor learning difficulties (71%), those who have switched off from school because of earlier experiences of exams (72%), those with behavioural problems (61%) or children with latent but not obvious potential (55%).
Parents agree, with three-quarters of them (75%) believing that too much of a focus on exam results might negatively affect their child’s wellbeing and half (50%) worrying that it would make school less enjoyable for their children than their time at school.
Greg Watson, Chief Executive of GL Assessment, which commissioned the surveys, said:
“It cannot be right that schools feel they have no option but to offer an increasingly restricted curriculum. All the evidence suggests that when students are offered a broad curriculum that develops their love of learning, academic performance is increased, regardless of the exams ultimately taken.”
Lee Walker, Headteacher of King Edward VI School, Bury St Edmunds, said his school has deliberately adopted a broad curriculum to equip students with an array of cultural, scientific, social and spiritual activities:
“Parents value the obvious impact this has on their child’s wellbeing, confidence and resilience, and understand why the school places such value on preparing children well for future success.”
Teachers say that student well-being is the primary casualty of an exam-driven curriculum with over half (51%) saying it is the issue that most concerns them. A fifth (21%) cite the neglect of a child’s individual learning needs as the most serious concern and 17% the fact that too much time is spent on exam practice.
David Crossley, Executive Director of Whole Education, said that well-being was a concern:
“The best curriculum inspires, builds confidence and prepares our young people for life and work. If all students are asked to do is focus on examinations, as well as increasing stress and exacerbating fear of failing, it negates the real purpose of learning.”
Right to Succeed is a charity that aims to eliminate the effects of poverty and system failure upon the achievement of young people.
We need to move towards a research lead, rather than the politically loaded education system that we have at the moment.